Krugman asks, Can it happen here? YES IT WILL.
Before I address what Paul Krugman had to say this morning, I urge you to hear what Elizabeth Warren has to say about healthcare and bankruptcy.
This morning Paul Krugman writes about health care in the The New York Times
He asks: Can it happen here?
That he must ask such a question is chilling.
That we as a nation continue to have a discussion which revolves around the concept of whether a human being in pain is entitled to be relieved of his suffering is horrifying.

I often find myself dazzled and amazed that we Americans continue to have the "discussion" about -how- should healthcare be available and affordable to all Americans.
How do we achieve universal coverage?
How do we make it affordable?
Are all Americans entitled to healthcare? That's right, entitled.
I live on a planet where healthcare is a basic human right. A planet where these sorts of questions are a symptom of the disease. And make no mistake, for-profit healthcare is a cancer on our society.
We continue to ask these questions, and have this so-called discussion for one reason. The American healthcare system is in the deathgrip stranglehold of the for-profit insurance industry. Isn't it strange that the rest of the industrialized or civilized world stopped having these nonsensical discussions eons ago.
In the rest of the industrialized world, delivering affordable and guaranteed healthcare is not something polite people discuss--it's a simple fact of life. But not in the United States. We're still in the talking phase. How revolting
Many of you quite correctly say that our sky rocketing premiums are nothing more than extortion money. I agree with this sentiment. And despite paying this ransom month after month into the overflowing coffering of the insurance industry, the number one cause of bankruptcy in the U.S. remains medical bills.
Returning to Elizabeth Warren.
Professor Warren is a great American hero. She just happpens to be a professor at Harvard Law School and is widely considered the dean of American bankruptcy law. Her immense authority is impossible to dismiss.
"Half of the families who filed for bankrupcy last year did so in the aftermath of receiving medical care"
What's up with the Democratic platform which Krugman highlights?
Michael Yaki, an Obama aide who directed the platform meetings, said the new language was a recognition there may be more than one way to achieve the shared goal of universal coverage.
"There's no real consensus yet on which is the best health care reform to do other than we are committed to universality and we're committed to getting there," Yaki said. "We believe that as you make health care more affordable, people will be able to buy health care — that's the basic principle. How we get there is a matter of the legislative process."
But cutting out the parasitic middleman won't be easy. The middleman insurance industry showered politicians with almost half a billion dollars in 2007!
What we consider "normal" is unthinkable in the rest of the civilized world and Krugman makes this point.
What’s easy about guaranteed health care for all? For one thing, we know that it’s economically feasible: every wealthy country except the United States already has some form of guaranteed health care. The hazards Americans treat as facts of life — the risk of losing your insurance, the risk that you won’t be able to afford necessary care, the chance that you’ll be financially ruined by medical costs — would be considered unthinkable in any other advanced nation.
Krugman has one other concern, will the politcians put healthcare on the back burner?
Not happening, Paul. Not happening. Think Tienanmen Square circa 1989.
The final hurdle facing health care reform is the risk that the next president and Congress will lose focus. There will be many problems crying out for solutions, from a weak economy to foreign policy crises. It will be easy and tempting to put health care on the back burner for a bit — and then forget about it.
The only solution to our national nightmare is single payer healthcare. Medicare for all. Obama knows this. Krugman knows this. Even AHIP knows this. But driving the u$eless and para$itic middleman from the face of the planet won't be ea$y.
If you are outraged contact your congre$$person on her summer break. Ask her why she has heavily taxpayer subsidized healthcare while the American people do without?
Ask her how much money she receives from the in$urance industry? Ask her if this is the reason she won't sponsor HR 676?
Here again, courtesy of Michael Moore, is a list of the co-sponsors of HR 676. if your representative is a co-sponsor, if s/he isn't, give her a call and remind her she works for you, not the insurance industry.
- nyceve's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Right on SiCKO sista, right on...
Elizabeth Warren is a hero... and absolute hero to all of us who need intelligent and useful facts to ground our passion to change this broken system.
I was lucky enough to sit next to her on July 17, 2007, in the same chambers where the Watergate hearings were held (appropriate, eh?) and testify about the financial devastation being felt by middle-class Americans -- insured, middle-class Americans -- as the result of this horrible and inhumane system of healthcare horrors.
She is simply brilliant. And she combines that unique ability to be brilliant without losing her humanity or her gentle spirit. To her I owe much.
I add her to the list of incredibly gifted fellow Americans who know that single payer, guaranteed healthcare for all is the right choice for all the right reasons. Thank you for including the segment in this wonderful piece, Eve.
Thank you from all who hunger for better. You are helping make it happen.
...unique ability to be brilliant without losing her humanity or
her gentle spirit"! That would be you, too, Donna. Your eloquence and courage in the face of personal adversity is an inspiration for nurses, especially. At the very core of our being, we understand that ours is a righteous fight to win MediCare for all.
"We commit ourselves to any wrong or degradation or injury when we do not protest against it." Lillian Wald,(1867-1940), American Social Reformer/Founder Public Health Nursing
For Profit as the Enemy
People: there is nothing wrong with motives "for profit". The problem with our medical system is that we don't have the patient choose how money is spent-- whether that be "not-for-profit" Medicare or private insurance systems. In all of these, we have bureaucrats deciding what people are allowed to have, not the patient!
Affordable systems only come when market forces are in effect. If we all bought cars with "claims money" from a fictional "car buying insurance" then the manufacturers would find ways to drive the prices through the roof! Furthermore, in response, your "car buying insurance premium" would skyrocket, as well as trying to limit your ability to buy a car.
Get it? No feedback. Patients are in the position of trying to use money that costs them nothing to use, and insurers (yes, even Medicare!) are working as hard as they can to stop the utilization.
Making the government the paymaster will also make them way too powerful! They will never submit to YOU being in control of choice. Rationing is what you will get, with endless explanations as to why "the cost is rising" followed by why you can't get what you need.
Our country was built on limiting the power of tyrants. We currently suffer under both mega-corporation tyranny as well as the heavy hand of government. We have hospitals jacking up the cost of care, yet our doctors are getting paid less and less per year.
The lesson: look at Plastic Surgery. Do you realize the cost of delivering total care for cosmetic jobs has DECREASED every year? The reason is simple: capitalism. PEOPLE are in charge of their money, and can go to anybody they want (no "networks") to get services. They get to use their own sense to decide who and when something gets done to them, and in response, the system has generated enough competition to drive prices down! It's no different than any human endeavor. As soon as you get monopolies or government meddling, systems degenerate. Look at China these days, and ask why they are becoming a powerhouse-- they are allowing competition and markets, while dismantling their centrally planned economy.
Why do you people want to set the clock backward and adopt inefficient, centrally-planned medical economies? Think about it- Does anybody here actually choose to go to a County hospital when you get sick? NO, they go to the nearest private hospital, even when a big County facility is near by. I live in Santa Clara, and I wouldn't send the family dog to Valley Medical Center.
Don't think that anybody should be in charge of your money but you. I favor indemnity insurance without strings. I think a system with competition, where people are paid with your money will respond to cost (price setting killed the Soviets). YES, you are going to have inequities, with the poor getting less and the rich getting more-- but that's the same with housing and food-- neither of which is somehow subject for cries for Universal Access...and these are far more basic needs than medicine.