Just another day on the front lines of the healthcare crisis.

I'm a cardiac rehab nurse at a mid-sized community hospital in Northrn California,  Today was just another day at work, but a day that kept bringing me face to face with the reality of how our lack of real healthcare hurts ordinary folks



My job splits in two parts - outpatient, where I run exercise classes for cardiac patients and inpatient, where I do education with cardiac patients during their hospitalization.  On the outpatient side, I rarely confront the pain of un- and under-insurance.  But in the hospital, I'm up against it every damn day.  And today was a little worse than most.

These days, the standard of care in heart disease calls for pretty much everyone to be put on a group of relatively expensive meds.  Most of the patients I see go home with prescriptions for a platelet inhibitor, a beta blocker, a cholesterol lowering med, and an ACE inhibitor.  There is some reason to debate the value of some of this, but they have been broadly accepted as the standard of therapy for people with heart disease.  This means people who have had heart attacks, stents, bypasses, etc. 

There is pretty good evidence that this regimen of meds saves lives.  But they cost a lot of money - several hundred a month.  And today it seemed that I was facing patient after patient who I knew damn well could not afford it.  People with Medicare who had not bought into the absurd part D drug plan.  People with insurance that requires them to pay 50% of their drug costs.  People with no insurance at all.  Restaurant cooks, farm workers, disabled people.

The grinding constant frustration of knowing that the doctor will write the prescription, the patient will nod his head and pretend he'll fill the prescription, and that a certain percentage of them will come back with problems that could have been prevented if they could actually get their meds.  One of the craziest things about all this is that many of these folks have just had very expensive inpatient treament.  The rules of the game in our emergency-driven system are such that if you show up at the door of our hospital having a heart attack, you get treatment - good tratment, usually - whether you can afford to pay or not.  The divide happens when it's time for the followup care and the meds you need to sustain your life afterwards.  so the patient may have had a $20,000 dollar hospitalization, but can't get a reliable access to the hundred dollar a month drug he needs to sustain the results of his hospital care.

I do what I can.  Try to find help for some patients.  Remind doctors to write for the least expensive thing that will work.  Quietly tell the patient which meds are truly essential and which ones they can probably get by without.

But too many days, I leave knowing that some one of the folks I saw today will die for lack of a medicine they could not afford.   

It is time for a change.  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I too have cared for patients that get great emergency care

They come in to the hospital having chest pain. They are wisked off to the cath lab and fixed with marvelous technology that allows the doctor to go into the coronary artery that is clogged up and open it.

But then these folks need to take a rather pricey drug called plavix for at least a month and usually longer. And if they don't have insurance or if their insurance doesn't cover plavix they often cannot afford to buy that essential drug.

I've seen patients who could not afford to get the plavix come back with another clog in one of their coronary arteries and another heart attack with the need for yet another cath lab procedure that again would not work as well as it should because the patient could not afford the follow up care: the plavix.

Sadder still are those that do not make it back because the heart attack that they then had was fatal.

It's an insane system. We must change it!

We need Single Payer Guaranteed Health Care so that tragedies like these won't happen. To so protect ourselves and our fellow neighbors makes sense all the way around. We'll be a stronger community, a safer community and a more productive community. We all deserve health care security.

And we can have that with Medicare for All.

Health care for all. No excuses.
www.nurseconscience.blogspot.com

It's a crazy mixed up world of priorities out there...

I took care of a relatively young liver transplant patient who was admitted with signs and symptoms of rejection. The operation was "covered", however the patient was sent home with prescriptions that he couldn't afford. The co-pays were hundreds of dollars a month. Because he was so sick, he couldn't work. His family and friends were all but "bake-saled" out, and he was tired of "being a burden." Before he was transferred he was given two more prescriptions: an anti-depressant, and a sleeping pill. Sadly, those meds could've been avoided with proper care and treatment and follow-up. When I called our hospital's case manager to arrange for hospice, I was told, "we don't take that insurance," but, "we'll get back to you when we can place him." Another victim of the system, "go ahead and die: the sooner the more cost effective." He's one of hundreds of patients I'll be marching for.

"We commit ourselves to any wrong or degradation or injury when we do not protest against it." Lillian Wald,(1867-1940), American Social Reformer/Founder Public Health Nursing

Our Protest In Louisville, Kentucky

Click the link below to see video and photos.
http://www.hillbillyreport.com/blog/2008/06/national-day--1.html
James Pence

cheap meds

Actually, many of these meds (BB, ACE, statins, diuretics) may be had at Walmart for 10 bucks for a three-month supply. By eliminating junk food and eating at home (instead of eating out), some patients should be able to afford them. Then again, there will always be some who won't. For whatever reason. The question remains, though, is this our responsibility or that of a government to provide meds? Or the patients'?
If the big government were to bestow meds on us, the next question is: What meds? All of them, or just the essential ones?
Finally, how many of the prescribed meds could be eliminated without any harm to the patient? Actually, this action may even prove to be beneficial as polypharmacy is as big of a problem as "under-pharmacy."
The life and medicine are complicated, I am sure you have noticed. Let's be honest: as a nurse, you do not have all the answers (this in in no way to suggest that doctors are in better position - I would be the first to admit that they are missing the point as well). I do not know the answer myself. That is why I am careful to sign under a new plan.
What happened to personal responsibility?