HEALTH INSURANCE CASUALTY OF THE DAY: Tracy Pierce - Mission, KS - 10/13/2008

Julie Pierce
Young Husband, Father Dies After Denial of Cancer Treatments
"Tracy Dion Pierce, 37, of Mission, Kan., died on January 18, 2006, at home after a courageous battle with renal cell carcinoma (kidney cancer)," writes Tracy's widow, Julie Pierce. "Tracy was a journeyman carpenter with Local #61 Carpenter's District Council in Kansas City. He was diagnosed with cancer in 2004, but his cancer eventually spread to his liver, lungs, lymph nodes, adrenal gland, renal cavity, and his brain."
The story of Tracy's illness and death was featured in Michael Moore's documentary film, SiCKO, but for Julie and her son, Tracy, Jr., the horror of losing Tracy, Sr., and the insurance denials go on. Read more casualties

Julie recounts all of the treatments recommended by Tracy's doctors but ultimately denied by their insurance carrier – First Health Coventry – right down to the morphine he so desperately needed in his final days before he died at home. "This sounds like just another statistic...but it's not. Tracy was not. Tracy Pierce was a father of a 14-year-old boy, a brother, a son, a friend, and he was my husband of 16 years!"
In 2007, Julie found out that because the cancer that killed her husband could also be genetic and be carried by their son, she would be wise to have Tracy, Jr., tested for the cancer marker that might indicate the need for aggressive screening in the future. But even though their insurance carrier had been the subject of intense scrutiny, they still denied the genetic testing for Julie's son. The testing was eventually done – but only after nurses raised the money need to cover the tests.
Just last week, Julie attended another vigil in Kansas City to remember her husband's death, and to continue the fight she promised Tracy she would never give up. "I never want another family to go through what we went through," Julie said.
----------------------------
Sponsored by the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee
Eighty-two percent of Americans think the U.S. healthcare system should be fundamentally changed or completely rebuilt (Commonwealth Fund, Aug. 7, 2008). America's nurses know that only single-payer, improved and expanded Medicare for all will fix our broken system and the tragedy of our devastated families. HR 676, by U.S. Rep John Conyers, is the most comprehensive, cost effective way to achieve guaranteed healthcare for all.
For more information, or to contact this patient: Liz Jacobs, RN 510/273-2232.
- Colette Washington CNA-NNOC's blog
- Login or register to post comments



How much money did they have
How much money did they have to raise for a test that might determine whether someone gets cancer down the line?
My great-grandfather lived until he was 92. Chain smoker. Ate whatever he wanted.
His son, my grandfather, drank and smoked his whole life. His whole life that ended when he was 56 from stomach cancer, two years before I was even born.
His son, my father, is now 64 and the picture of health.
Based on my great-grandfather and my grandfather, my father should have that the BS ERRRR medically necessary test to see if he got a disease that may or may not strike him. I guess I should, too.
Or we could just live our lives and see if we have any symptoms that may signal an actual onset of the disease before having thousands of dollars of tests done.
I wonder why the insurance carrier denied that. Gee, why don't we test EVERYONE in the country for a cancer they may or may not get? If we added that to every routine preventive visit, how many more millions of dollars would hospitals and facilities make a year for a test that can't accurately predict the future?
That's the vision of 'single payer health care'. Order thousands of dollars of BS tests and have someone else pay for it so doctors and facilities can make even more money off the taxpayers.
Scuzz...Scuzz...Scuzz...
Scuzz...Scuzz...Scuzz...
I find this latest rant interesting in its focus and its total, convenient, disregard for the benefits of health care screening. Per Working Knowledge, a weekly newsletter published by Harvard Business School, dated 7-16-08, referring to helthcare provision "prevention and screening can dramatically improve value." Remember the old adage a stich in time...
Of course this response only addresses the almighty dollar, with no regard to human suffering...
preventive care only applies sometimes
Evidence based medicine would suggest that preventive care is beneficial in certain circumstances - not all. For example, unless a guy has certain risk factors, generaly prostate checks don't begin until well into middle age. Same goes for mammography. i agree with Scuzz that 'what works' should be what's encouraged - not just want one person wants or one doctors wants unless those paying for it agree.