McCain's latest health care idea - ration veterans care to those with combat injuries
What's wrong with this picture? Sen. John McCain, who has implicitly criticized his opponent in the Presidential campaign for inadequate support for the troops, now wants to limit veterans' healthcare benefits to those with combat injuries.
McCain's latest scheme, in fact, mirrors his overhall antipathy to anything that smacks of "government" health care, mirroring the views of the Bush administration. But is that the humane system our veterans deserve?

McCain's proposal for rationing Veterans Administration care to soldiers whose injuries "are a direct result of combat" came in a town hall meeting Wednesday in Dover, NH.
This was, understandably, big news in the Army Times whose readers presumably include many veterans and active military personnel who are in need of medical care and may well expect it is the least their country can offer in return for their service.
Here's what Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense, told the Army Times. Veterans "should be very concerned by any effort to restrict access to VA health care and benefits by excluding other veterans with medical conditions clearly linked with their military service, such as illnesses related to Agent Orange poisoning, injuries incurred in the combat zone, injuries due to training, and the adverse side effects of vaccines and experimental drugs."
Good points. One might also note that post traumatic stress syndrome has become something of a plague for Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. And, there's the Pentagon report from May that the Army's suicide rate has jumped significantly. Lt. Gen. Eric Schoomaker, the Army surgeon general, concurrently acknowledged that the military's current mental health facilities are inadequate.
As astonishing as the McCain's proposal may sound, it bears a strong resemblance to the path already blazed by the current administration. As the Army Times notes, the Bush administration has repeatedly drawn a line between combat and non-combat injuries on a wide array of benefits, from disability payments to traumatic injury insurance to death gratuity payments.
Moreover, the administration has been systematically underfunding veterans healthcare, paring more and more veterans from enrollment, and privatizing portions of the VA system (the hidden story behind the Walter Reed scandal).
For McCain, and for President Bush, ideology apparently trumps guaranteeing healthcare for our veterans. McCain has made attacks on Sen. Barack Obama's health plan as "government-run" health care (which it isn't) a common sound bite for his stump speeches.
It's the reason Bush has worked to privatize significant segments of Medicare, and why McCain continues to make more deregulation a centerpiece of his own healthcare plan.
A compilation of U.S. Census Bureau data by Harvard medical faculty members J. Wesley Boyd and Danny McCormick last fall concluded that one out of every eight living veterans under 65 have no private health insurance, no ongoing access to VA health care and little chance of getting medical or mental health attention when they need it.
In other words, veterans are increasingly in the same boat with other Americans at a time when 75 million are uninsured or underinsured and 20 percent put off needed medical care because of cost.
Instead of trying to cut more veterans off the humane healthcare they deserve, McCain ought to be finding ways to expand it.
With the billions we now spend on the war in Iraq, we could certainly spend some of those resources on assuring quality, comprehensive health care to those who have served there.
And, here's another idea. Everyone else deserves quality health care as well. Extend VA care or Medicare care to all Americans.
- Chuck Idelson's blog
- Login or register to post comments



scary
Wow, limiting veteren healthcare? that is truly scary as McCain will also want to limit the rest of our healthcare as well.
Of course he does!
Of course McCain wants to limit health care...all in the name of the "Free Market".
Some of the best health care I ever received was in an Air Force hospital, and I am not a combat veteran.
Supposedly the Republicans are the party that respects the military. McCain has been covered by government health care ever since birth. When I was in the Air National Guard, I was only covered when I was on active duty for training or callup. Otherwise I was in the same boat as every other American.
Universal health care is NOT "socialised medicine"!
Tortured, beaten daily, in severe pain and denied treatment,
by the insurance companies? That's what's happening to us as a nation, here and now. Yet, according to several published reports, that's how John McCain was treated by his North Vietnamese captors at the infamous Hanoi Hilton. McCain agreed to talk in exchange for medical treatment. Why isn't he talking about single-payer now?
Token acts of "kindness" by a captor, after prolongued deprivation, isolation, and physical abuse, when the captive cannot escape and is threatened with death, has been identified with the development of the "Stockholm" syndrome, among prisoners of war.
It doesn't require a broad stretch of the imagination to see a parallel between a captive McCain and candidate McCain. He supports the insurance industry's interests, and he opposes a single-payer national health plan that would free all of us from the nightmarish strangle-hold they have on our health care.
Could some form or manifestation of the Stockholm syndrome explain why Harry and Louise, and so many others are deceived and victimized into acting against their own rational, best interest when it comes to health care?
I'm just cynical enough to believe that insurers and big PhRMA know a thing or two about the "Stockholm" syndome, and they can go toe to toe with the Hanoi Hilton anyday when it comes to wooing their for-profit-health-care captives--us! They wouldn't want us to rise up and declare war on their profits now, would they? They wouldn't want us to believe that money could be better spent on providing actual care for people?
Look at the current token, "act of kindness" campaign being hyped by big PhRMA. The bus-on-the-road-show, with the message that goes something like this, "...can't afford your prescription drugs? Maybe we can help." A token black actor, a token elder, a token parent, a token patient then appears, claiming to have been helped by the random act of kindness.
No doubt for those three or four, it's true, they were helped. The commercials are repeated and repeated and repeated until those four have created the illusion that legions have been provided with a service. What about the 47 million who are rationed out of the system, and can't get in to see a doctor to even get a prescription medication in the first place?
As victims begin to identify with their captors, they actually begin to identify with and agree with their goals, preferences, and dislikes. Think, Patti Hearst: SLA. Think, John McCain: AHIP, PhRMA!
Our veterans have done their part; they deserve better. All of us deserve better, a national, not-for-profit health plan, HR 676.
Obama '08! Where we lead, he will follow!
http://www.guaranteedhealthcare.org
"We commit ourselves to any wrong or degradation or injury when we do not protest against it." Lillian Wald,(1867-1940), American Social Reformer/Founder Public Health Nursing